In 1999, research scientist, Helene Hill, saw what she thought might be scientific misconduct – fabrication of experimental data – on the part of a scientist in the laboratory in which she worked. She reported it to the laboratory supervisor who was unconvinced so she let it pass. The spurious data were used to support a grant application to the National Cancer Institute which was subsequently funded. A year or so later, another scientist was added to the laboratory staff. This individual later expressed to Dr. Hill that he had similar suspicions about the first fellow. Hill, fortified by additional independent observations, reported her suspicions to the Campus Committee on Research Integrity. There then followed a long odyssey of failures. The Campus Committee thought that she and her co-worker were lying and turned her down. The Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the US Public Health Service subsequently turned her down. She turned to the Federal Court, the judge said she was quixotic and turned her down. But now she had overwhelming evidence that experiments recorded in eight scientific publications and used to support government grants worth two and a half million dollars were extremely likely to have been fabricated. Trying again at the University and the ORI, she was turned away again. She appealed the judge’s decision and failed again. Her only recourse was to write this book. It has been written to demonstrate to scientists, to law makers and to the public at large that the way our country deals with scientific misconduct simply does not work. Miscreants who are caught get away with nothing more than a slap on the wrist. Scientists turn a blind eye when it comes to other scientists – many of whom are their friends and colleagues – who are falsifying data. Many scientists are too busy to care – until it happens to them. Millions of dollars are misspent every year. Only a few of the cheaters are caught and even fewer of those are punished. Journals fear challenges to published works lest they be sued. This book is a wake-up call. How could one individual have gotten away with so much untenable data? How can so many so-called reasonable scientists turn a blind eye? Much of it lies in knowing what is in it for them. Scientists need to get large research grants to get promoted, to get offers of better, more prestigious jobs, to win the admiration of their colleagues. They are the big shots and control the field. This book is a call for reform. If people on Wall Street go to jail for mismanaging other people’s money, why shouldn’t scientists who intentionally misuse public funds suffer the same punishment? If doctors, nurses, dentists, veterinarians are overseen and disciplined by state boards, why aren’t research scientists subject to the same oversight? Why do we, the scientists, continued to let the fox, our fox, watch the hen house? Why are universities, medical facilities, research institutes not called to account when their scientists cheat? Shouldn’t these organizations have to return the misspent funds and then some? Wake up, America! It is time for a new paradigm for truth in science!

Hidden Data: The Blind Eye of Science

Medical Books

Hill, Helene Z

Medicine

CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform

Science & Math

Biological Sciences

Bookwhip Company

Dr. Helene Hill learned this the hard way when she stumbled on evidence, nearly two decades ago, in a trash can, that a young assistant in a colleagues' lab was concealing his fabrication of data. But neither the assistant's supervisor (then an un-tenured faculty member) nor the university, nor the government watch dog charged with investigating misconduct believed Hill. 
The case dragged on for years, and all the while, "science" based on the original cooked study went on, generating peer-reviewed publications and $2.5 million dollars in new federal grants, all based on the initial refusal to fully examine the evidence of misconduct. 
In the end, Hill lost a qui tem lawsuit as well as its appeal. But, the evidence in her statistical analysis points to the certainty that the data was cooked. What Hill learned is that the scientific evidence of misconduct takes a back seat, in the law, to the process that defers to internal politics within universities, including those (like hers) which are notoriously replete with illegal self-dealing, hand-shake agreements, and the promotion of morally bankrupt pursuit of funding and fame at the expense of research standards that protect human health and promote healing.

Helene Z. Hill

See the best price to sell, buy, or rent books by Hill, Helene Z. BookScouter helps to compare book prices from 25+ online bookstores and 30+ buyback vendors with a single search.

Books by Hill, Helene Z